The proof that liberals are irrational and will take any position no matter how inconsistent it might be:
1. All cops are racists, but only cops should carry guns.
2. We have foreign interference in elections, but voter ID laws are immoral.
3. GMOs are good and vaccines are bad.
4. Climate change (<100 years) is settled but two sexes (<250k years) are in doubt.
5. Drinking Big Gulps is bad, but glasses of wine with more calories is good.
6. Supporting homosexuality AND Sharia law simultaneously.
7. Open borders are great while living in gated and guarded communities.
8. It's morally abhorent to execute a serial killer, but killing infants is okay.
9.
Preaching about the wonders of wind and solar polar while ignoring the
environmental damage (i.e. fire hazards, toxic chemical composition) of
these technologies.
and my personal favorite....
10. "Why do we need tree loggers? We can get the wood at Lowe's."
That about nails it.
Monday, April 29, 2019
Monday, April 15, 2019
He's back! Swalwell Pt. 3
Yep - Eric Swalwell is back!The gift that keeps on giving!
From Breitbart:
Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) and 2020 presidential hopeful said the Second Amendment was not an absolute right.
Discussing his proposal to “ban possession of military-style semi-automatic assault weapons,” Swalwell said, “You know, keep your pistols, keep your long rifles, keep your shotguns. I want the most dangerous weapons, these weapons of war, out of the hands of the most dangerous people. But when it comes to what else we can do, because I don’t even suggest this is all we can do, I also want background checks. So do 73% of NRA members.”
When asked if he wants to repeal the Second Amendment, Swalwell said, “No I don’t agree but I think the greatest threat to the 2nd Amendment is doing nothing. The Second Amendment is not an absolute right. Just like free speech, you can’t shout fire in a theater or lie about the products you are selling. You can’t own a bazooka. You can’t own a tank. You cant own rocket propelled grenades. We should put some limits in place, and I think the American people are with me. I’m no longer intimidated by the NRA.”
All righty then, let's see:
1. I am an NRA member and Certified Basic Pistol and Personal Protection in the Home Instructor. I don't believe you that 73% want more background checks. And I do not care if they do or the NRA does. I do not. Thanks - I will just keep all of my guns.
2. I think we call that an reductio ad absurdium argument - whether I can or cannot own a bazooka or a tank or an RPG has nothing to do with me owning the legal firearms I currently own.
This jerk-off is just another of those liberals who believe in magic; find a way to pass a law and all of those gun owners will magically just line up to "hand them in, Mr. and Mrs. America". Sure some will, because some small percentage of the population is always ready to hand over their freedoms and responsibilities to protect themselves and their loved ones. Such little despots always come along with a smile and a "trust us" approach. I suspect there is a tale to tell about those who have been subject to such events in history.
Once more for the mentally impaired among us:
- A lot of people are not going to let you buy them back
- You will need willing people with guns to come and take them
- Many LEOs are already refusing to enforce confiscation laws, so good luck with that
- Those you can get to agree to be confiscators are going to have to go house-to-house to relieve their owners of them
- Someone with guns knocks on the door or kicks it in, says there here to take my property? Lethal force is now justified.
From Breitbart:
Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) and 2020 presidential hopeful said the Second Amendment was not an absolute right.
Discussing his proposal to “ban possession of military-style semi-automatic assault weapons,” Swalwell said, “You know, keep your pistols, keep your long rifles, keep your shotguns. I want the most dangerous weapons, these weapons of war, out of the hands of the most dangerous people. But when it comes to what else we can do, because I don’t even suggest this is all we can do, I also want background checks. So do 73% of NRA members.”
When asked if he wants to repeal the Second Amendment, Swalwell said, “No I don’t agree but I think the greatest threat to the 2nd Amendment is doing nothing. The Second Amendment is not an absolute right. Just like free speech, you can’t shout fire in a theater or lie about the products you are selling. You can’t own a bazooka. You can’t own a tank. You cant own rocket propelled grenades. We should put some limits in place, and I think the American people are with me. I’m no longer intimidated by the NRA.”
All righty then, let's see:
1. I am an NRA member and Certified Basic Pistol and Personal Protection in the Home Instructor. I don't believe you that 73% want more background checks. And I do not care if they do or the NRA does. I do not. Thanks - I will just keep all of my guns.
2. I think we call that an reductio ad absurdium argument - whether I can or cannot own a bazooka or a tank or an RPG has nothing to do with me owning the legal firearms I currently own.
This jerk-off is just another of those liberals who believe in magic; find a way to pass a law and all of those gun owners will magically just line up to "hand them in, Mr. and Mrs. America". Sure some will, because some small percentage of the population is always ready to hand over their freedoms and responsibilities to protect themselves and their loved ones. Such little despots always come along with a smile and a "trust us" approach. I suspect there is a tale to tell about those who have been subject to such events in history.
Once more for the mentally impaired among us:
- A lot of people are not going to let you buy them back
- You will need willing people with guns to come and take them
- Many LEOs are already refusing to enforce confiscation laws, so good luck with that
- Those you can get to agree to be confiscators are going to have to go house-to-house to relieve their owners of them
- Someone with guns knocks on the door or kicks it in, says there here to take my property? Lethal force is now justified.
Friday, April 12, 2019
You too can be this stupid - if you try hard enough
Round 2 of the Swallwell chronicles.
So, as we can see, Sara Rumpf notes for brainless Swallwell that trying to confiscate firearms (be honest Eric, that's what you want to do, just wrap it up in the misdirection of "buying back" something you didn't sell) might lead to bloodshed. He, as might be expected, gets his panties in a wad; "Whose blood, why?" Only a representative from CA who lives with his own security could ask that, Constitution much?
Now remember, this is the numb nuts who noted that, if gun owners resisted his confiscation scheme - well, the government has nukes so the resistance would be brief. Now he's gone all mushy because someone said blood will be shed.
I posted it a few days ago, but apparently he needs to see it again:
- A lot of people are not going to let you buy them back
- You will need willing people with guns to come and take them
- Many LEOs are already refusing to enforce confiscation laws, so good luck with that
- Those you CAN get to agree are going to have to go house-to-house to retrieve them
- Someone with guns knocks on the door or kicks it in, says they're here to take my property? Lethal force is now justified.
So - moron - that's how blood will come to be shed. Will the American people really stand by for that? Some of us took an oath to defend the constitution - and will go down fulfilling that oath as necessary. I know such focus, commitment, and sheer will is beyond your comprehension. But I've had a long life, and I will not die on my knees for your warped ideology.
So, as we can see, Sara Rumpf notes for brainless Swallwell that trying to confiscate firearms (be honest Eric, that's what you want to do, just wrap it up in the misdirection of "buying back" something you didn't sell) might lead to bloodshed. He, as might be expected, gets his panties in a wad; "Whose blood, why?" Only a representative from CA who lives with his own security could ask that, Constitution much?
Now remember, this is the numb nuts who noted that, if gun owners resisted his confiscation scheme - well, the government has nukes so the resistance would be brief. Now he's gone all mushy because someone said blood will be shed.
I posted it a few days ago, but apparently he needs to see it again:
- A lot of people are not going to let you buy them back
- You will need willing people with guns to come and take them
- Many LEOs are already refusing to enforce confiscation laws, so good luck with that
- Those you CAN get to agree are going to have to go house-to-house to retrieve them
- Someone with guns knocks on the door or kicks it in, says they're here to take my property? Lethal force is now justified.
So - moron - that's how blood will come to be shed. Will the American people really stand by for that? Some of us took an oath to defend the constitution - and will go down fulfilling that oath as necessary. I know such focus, commitment, and sheer will is beyond your comprehension. But I've had a long life, and I will not die on my knees for your warped ideology.
Tuesday, April 9, 2019
Yea, you just give it a try
Just keep pushing asshole!
Good old reliable dumb ass Eric Swalwell, now I guess thinking he should run for president (why not, every other democrat idiot is).
So, he's going to ban our guns ("assault rifles") and then make all of us sell them to the gubmint. I'm sure he figures he will be hiding behind his personal security and those few men and women in gubmint employ who will be willing to try to make his wet dream happen.
Well, ya'll come on down...but remember it's going to be a house-to-house operation, with losses at each stop. Folks like me are just too damned old to be willing to go down that road, end our lives on our knees to you; a life that included serving in the forces that defend the country and constitution. So how long will it be before "the people" lose their taste for that kind of domestic bloodshed?
I would hope that, beside us old farts, the young ones would see the folly in submitting to a long life on bended knee, dependent and subservient.
Either way - come on down. I have nothing better to do and I grow tired of your foolishness.
Good old reliable dumb ass Eric Swalwell, now I guess thinking he should run for president (why not, every other democrat idiot is).
So, he's going to ban our guns ("assault rifles") and then make all of us sell them to the gubmint. I'm sure he figures he will be hiding behind his personal security and those few men and women in gubmint employ who will be willing to try to make his wet dream happen.
Well, ya'll come on down...but remember it's going to be a house-to-house operation, with losses at each stop. Folks like me are just too damned old to be willing to go down that road, end our lives on our knees to you; a life that included serving in the forces that defend the country and constitution. So how long will it be before "the people" lose their taste for that kind of domestic bloodshed?
I would hope that, beside us old farts, the young ones would see the folly in submitting to a long life on bended knee, dependent and subservient.
Either way - come on down. I have nothing better to do and I grow tired of your foolishness.
Tuesday, April 2, 2019
A truly tragic occurrence
Tragic story of a young lady, far too trusting and naive, getting into a car she thought was her Uber ride.
Tragic and unnecessary death
Lessons to be learned:
1. First, let's remember that, even if it were her Uber, to assume all is well and she can let her guard down was not good.
2. Given #1, be on alert whenever getting into ANY strange car (or standing on the street at 2 AM).
3. Carry some form of self-defense tool. I would suggest a firearm, but if you are not willing to do that, carry pepper spray, carry a taser, carry a club. Be sure you know how to use the weapon you choose. Carry something (but really - make it a firearm)!
4. Have that weapon you choose to carry in your hand surreptitiously when you get into the vehicle. If it is in your purse, your hand should be in the purse, holding onto it, ready to deploy. If in a pocket, then likewise. If carried in the waistband, have a hand hovering over it. Better to be prepared for the violence that never happens than be caught unaware and unprepared.
5. Sit behind the driver, where you have the advantage and cannot be easily reached or targeted.
6. Don't hesitate to use lethal force as necessary. If you are unwilling to use force, then you should not get in cars with strangers or be on the street at 2 AM. No one is advocating that you look for trouble, but that you be damned ready should it find you...and you never know when it might do so.
7. Nothing good happens on the streets at 2 AM - unless your a violent criminal - at best you survive.
Not blaming the victim - it would be best for all of us if we lived in a world where things like this did not happen, where people like this perpetrator did not exist. But they do exist and will continue to do so, so it behooves each of us to be prepared for them. I suspect this young lady would have said she could never do those things - and am certain she never thought that this kind of event could happen to her. It did. That is unfortunate.
This is how it should go! [SORRY - LINKEE NO WORKEE...BUT SHE DRAWS FROM HER WAISTBAND AND PUTS TWO INTO HIM AND HE LIES ON THE GROUND LIKE THE POS HE IS!]
Tragic and unnecessary death
Lessons to be learned:
1. First, let's remember that, even if it were her Uber, to assume all is well and she can let her guard down was not good.
2. Given #1, be on alert whenever getting into ANY strange car (or standing on the street at 2 AM).
3. Carry some form of self-defense tool. I would suggest a firearm, but if you are not willing to do that, carry pepper spray, carry a taser, carry a club. Be sure you know how to use the weapon you choose. Carry something (but really - make it a firearm)!
4. Have that weapon you choose to carry in your hand surreptitiously when you get into the vehicle. If it is in your purse, your hand should be in the purse, holding onto it, ready to deploy. If in a pocket, then likewise. If carried in the waistband, have a hand hovering over it. Better to be prepared for the violence that never happens than be caught unaware and unprepared.
5. Sit behind the driver, where you have the advantage and cannot be easily reached or targeted.
6. Don't hesitate to use lethal force as necessary. If you are unwilling to use force, then you should not get in cars with strangers or be on the street at 2 AM. No one is advocating that you look for trouble, but that you be damned ready should it find you...and you never know when it might do so.
7. Nothing good happens on the streets at 2 AM - unless your a violent criminal - at best you survive.
Not blaming the victim - it would be best for all of us if we lived in a world where things like this did not happen, where people like this perpetrator did not exist. But they do exist and will continue to do so, so it behooves each of us to be prepared for them. I suspect this young lady would have said she could never do those things - and am certain she never thought that this kind of event could happen to her. It did. That is unfortunate.
This is how it should go! [SORRY - LINKEE NO WORKEE...BUT SHE DRAWS FROM HER WAISTBAND AND PUTS TWO INTO HIM AND HE LIES ON THE GROUND LIKE THE POS HE IS!]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)