Sure sucks to be a mid-level manager in the federal bureaucracy. Sure seems to me that if the head of an organization that size is to be held responsible for its transgressions, then perhaps the man at the top needs to acknowledge his failures, too. Why should the little guy fall on his sword to protect the top?
Lots of "I never heard about it, I didn't know" explanations coming from the top of the hierarchy these days. That didn't fly under the previous administration and should not fly here. At the very least, it suggests that a certain culture has been established - and culture that is not a good one.
You really have to decide - is it ignorance, incompetence or malevolence? None of them is good. Is somebody too busy campaigning for hot agenda items like gun control to keep an eye on his own back yard and those working in it?
No comments:
Post a Comment