So, California - San Francisco - strictest gun laws, most anti-gun government in the county; how does this happen?
It is obvious and a lesson for all such areas to learn - and, damn, how often do people have to say this to get it through your thick head? Laws against guns are just that - laws. Just like laws against theft, robbery, rape, or murder. People who will use a firearm to rob, assault or kill another person are already breaking those laws - so what makes you think that adding another to the list is going to stop them. Do you really think they will decide not to kill another person because they may violate a firearms law?
Laws against guns are just that - laws. And people who follow laws, no matter what they are, will usually follow them (although many have come to feel the laws are unjust, unconstitutional and put them at risk and, so, may not). People who do not, will not. By definition, those who would murder others do not. I thought you people in San Francisco - in California - were supposed to be so damned smart - yet you cannot figure out this simple fact. I am sure the answer to this conundrum - that your gun laws did not prevent this crime - will be to enact even more draconian laws.
Laws against guns are nothing more than laws. Criminals break laws. Law-abiding citizens prefer not to do so. Thus, in general, those laws simply make the prey more helpless and the predator more lethal and dangerous.
No comments:
Post a Comment