1. Loretta Lynch(a):
"Our common humanity transcends our differences, and our most effective response to terror is compassion, it’s unity and it’s love."
Where to begin?
- She really thinks that the way to combat people who want to kill you and have shown their willingness to do so in most gruesome ways is give them a group hug? You turn the other cheek, I'll cover you.
- Okay, maybe she means that those under siege should hug each other. If that's her idea, then I await the day when she and Wayne LaPierre have a big hug, when she hugs all the folks her boss and his sock puppets routinely call homophobes, islamophobes, racists, domestic terrorists, gun nuts, "clingers to God and guns" and the like. Can she just be honest this once: For her to talk this way is just absurd since she is part of an administration that has presided over and facilitated the great division of American society. From "Clinging to God and guns..." to "Police acted stupidly" to "If I had a son..." and so on, the idea solidarity beyond their own bases (or what they think is their own base) is truly the furthest thing from this administration's mind and this faux "love stuff" routine clearly refers only to its constituents.
So much for "common humanity".
Loretta Lynch(b): Yes, she's been on a roll today - Susan Rice better watch out.
"I'm not going to go into the detail of the process behind it. Our review was not to further spread the propaganda, but once it became a distraction, we released the whole transcript."
By now it is well known that earlier in the week DOJ released a transcript of the killer's calls during the Orlando killings - a transcript that was much censored and redacted. After a great deal of outrage that they could somehow take it upon themselves to decide what we should be allowed to see (especially given that the redaction was so ham-handed and it did not take a rocket scientists to fill in the blanks), a decision was made to release the full transcript. The quote above was her response when asked who had made the initial decision to redact the original.
It has been well-documented over several years that there has been a determined effort guided form the top to purge policy, intelligence, and training documents of any references to Islamic terrorism and its inherent vocabulary (e.g., jihad, sharia). It does not take much to recognize that same tactic in this inept attempt. The buck stops at the top. If the person who did it is not publicly admonished and fired then we know where it came from.
Goes back to the point above. Lots of love for some, lots of hate for others.
2. Charlie Rangel: The Clown Prince of Harlem. COuld likely get re-elected even if frozen body parts were found in his freezer.
“Well law-abiding citizens just shouldn’t have to carry a gun,” Rangel responded. “You know that, so you’re not going to push me in that direction.”
“But you’re protected by guns all over the place here in the Capitol,” she pointed out.
Rangel laughed at that. “Well that’s a little different,” he chuckled. “I think we deserve–I think we need to be protected down here.”
- It is so refreshing for a liberal democrat to finally say this out loud and even more so for an interviewer to have finally asked one of these hypocrites this question. It always boils down to this. As one might expect from Rangel, given his limited intelligence and vast ego, he actually answered this honestly, reflecting what the democrat/liberal political class thinks of the rest of us.
- They are important enough to require protection, provided by the very people that they consider too menial to "deserve" it. We are left to call 911 and wait for the "response time" to pass.
Not likely Charlie.
3. Democrat sit-in:
Let them sit, stand, cry, whine, have their tantrum. That's how you deal with out-of-control children when they misbehave in public places. Don't argue or try to reason, don't give them the attention they desire, simply walk away and let them hold their breath and stomp their feet. When they realize no one is coming to save them, no one cares, they will catch up with you later.
Acting childish does not prove they are right, it proves they are immature. And given the issue over which they are having their tantrum, is simply takes us back to points 1 and 2.
4. More democrat sit-in or the end of it - such sacrifice. I hope none of them developed PTSD.
From the pardon my redundancy department, but some people never listen. These are the bills on which they are demanding votes:
- Bar those on a no-fly list from buying firearms: Now, let's just ponder this for a minute. Raise your hand if you were alive and listening during GWB's 8 years. Do you remember how aghast all of us - these people, too - were that the government might be surveying and keeping lists of people they considered threats - lists that were not open to the public. Now, fast-forward to today and her they all sit, whining for using secret government lists that no one has access to and no one can easily get off of to curtail basic rights. Take that in - really think about what they are saying. they have not values - the new America in which we live is lead by valueless people. Surveillance and black-lists are not bad unless it is your opponents who use them. If your party's president wants to create lists of undesirables without any due process, no big deal.
- Requiring background checks for gun purchases at gun shows and online: How many times do you people need to be told? I have bought many firearms at gun shows and have never bought one without a background check. There is no "gun show loophole". Private sellers can meet anywhere to conduct business. I have bought firearms from online vendors - and never without them being routed through FFLs for background checks. Again, making a deal through email and then meeting is a private sale, not an "internet loophole". You spend too much time sitting on your brains.
So - can you f/n believe this?
No comments:
Post a Comment