Now imagine a movie in which "deplorables" are hunted down ("The Hunt"). And please don't try to deny that you know who the "deplorables" are!
Now, riddle me this: How is this not inciting violence? How is this not the kind of thing that the Dayton or El Paso shooter would have found motivational? In fact, it has been reported that the Dayton shooter (yes, the Warren supporter) enjoyed watching videos of mass killings. Now he could - if the scumbag had lived - see it on the big screen - and then shoot up the theater. Of course, it would all be the gun's, gun owners' and NRA's fault.
So, their point is: Violence and hate are bad, unless they are directed at the right group. This movie - and every democrat candidate for POTUS - have clearly identified who that "right group" is. Please use critical thinking and evaluate this presentation in combination with a desire to disarm law-abiding gun owners. Remember that we are all deplorable because we are all complicit in their eyes. If you are a member of the NRA or GOA or any other 2A-supporting organization, then you are considered a domestic terrorist.
Don't think for an instant that these "deplorables" will so sheepishly go to the slaughter you have planned. You may be about to learn what the Second Amendment was actually intended to accomplish.
I reiterate here what I now consider highly likely consequences of this divisive and dangerous democrat strategy:
- A lot of people are not going to turn firearms in willingly, not going to hand over their rightfully-owned property. Plenty of data support this, not only in the US where bans and "buybacks" have been widely ignored, but in other nations where this tyranny has been enacted.
- Willing people with guns will be needed to "come and take" them from armed non-compliant citizens. So guns will be left in the hands of government to enforce this unconstitutional mandate. This merely proves how prescient the founders were in codifying the illegality of infringement and the sanctity of the right to keep and bear arms.
-The first line of traitors who will attempt confiscate arms will be drawn from local Law Enforcement. A lot of LEOs will refuse to enforce such laws. It is likely, especially in some urban areas and Socialist states, that ample traitors will violate their oaths. This will put LEO on both sides of this conflict. In my State, there are Sheriffs who will not suborn such infringement and may act against it.
- Those traitors who do comply and enlist to enforce confiscatory actions are going to have to go house-to-house in some locales to retrieve them. This will not only be in the suburbs, but in high density population centers as well (less likely that the efforts will ensue in rural locales). Those affected by this confiscation will represent a wide range of races, ethnicity and ages. This may even serve to unite groups that have previously been at odds, given a common enemy - at least for a while. This will be a massive undertaking in what will be significantly hostile environments - and such environments favor the defender unless methods of mass destruction are used (If you don't think so, ponder why areas of cities like Baltimore and Chicago are basically no-enforcement zones. Consider LEOs being assaulted with water and buckets in NYC or harassed in Philly while under siege from a career criminal gunman).
- When those in uniform carrying guns knock on your door or kick it in, announcing they are there to take your property by force, the first thing it should do is bring up images of all of the totalitarian regimes in history. Here are armed representatives of your government, forcibly entering your domicile, demanding that you turn over your property, threatening you and yours with bodily harm if you do not. Be sure if this happens you have the cameras rolling to create a historical record for broadcast as proof of the imposition of unconstitutional law by lethal force. I think the LEOs who defy their oath will soon find that "Blue Lives Matter" is contingent on them being faithful to their oath, not the unlawful whims of politicians and government. Many who believe blue lives matter will also resist confiscation.
- Lethal force is justified no matter the law. Yes, I know - Castle Doctrine has exceptions for LEO who are there in an LE capacity. But, frankly, once the Inherent Rights of the Individual, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights are violated and infringement is in progress, protection of ourselves, our loved ones and our "Castle" now reflects the existence and precedence of common and natural law - since their actions are without true rule of law and have abrogated any other legal consideration. Remember, the Second Amendment did not create the right, it merely asserts that the existing right shall be not be infringed upon by government.
- There will be blood - on all sides. Betty and Bobby Suburban (who probably applauded gun confiscation) will be woken up by the gunshots at the next-door neighbors' house, as the traitor police make entry and the law-abiding homeowner is forced to defend himself, his family, his property and his rights. Hell, they will probably be the ones who called police to report a "Red Flag" warning. They may be woken up by the neighbor they turned in using the "Report your local rifle owner" hotline. Either one of these may become fairly common occurrences, along with SWATting and Red-Flagging.
- Given that most Americans do not even have the hearts or fortitude for long protracted violent engagements on the other side of the world, and have shown a great reticence to defend their own nation against enemies, foreign and domestic, for how long is it likely they will have it for door-to-door operations in their own neighborhood? I suspect not for long.
No comments:
Post a Comment